Correlation Between Stone Harbor and MFS Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stone Harbor and MFS Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stone Harbor and MFS Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stone Harbor Emerging and MFS Investment Grade, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stone Harbor and MFS Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stone Harbor with a short position of MFS Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stone Harbor and MFS Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Stone Harbor and MFS Investment

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Stone and MFS is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stone Harbor Emerging and MFS Investment Grade in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MFS Investment Grade and Stone Harbor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stone Harbor Emerging are associated (or correlated) with MFS Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MFS Investment Grade has no effect on the direction of Stone Harbor i.e., Stone Harbor and MFS Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Stone Harbor and MFS Investment

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Stone Harbor is expected to generate 1.97 times less return on investment than MFS Investment. In addition to that, Stone Harbor is 2.26 times more volatile than MFS Investment Grade. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. MFS Investment Grade is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  797.00  in MFS Investment Grade on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11.00  from holding MFS Investment Grade or generate 1.38% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Stone Harbor Emerging  vs.  MFS Investment Grade

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stone Harbor Emerging are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. Despite nearly inconsistent fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.
MFS Investment Grade 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days MFS Investment Grade has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, MFS Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Stone Harbor and MFS Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Stone Harbor and MFS Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Stone Harbor and MFS Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stone Harbor position performs unexpectedly, MFS Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MFS Investment will offset losses from the drop in MFS Investment's long position.
The idea behind Stone Harbor Emerging and MFS Investment Grade pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments