Correlation Between Everest and APx Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Everest and APx Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Everest and APx Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Everest Group and APx Acquisition I, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Everest and APx Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Everest with a short position of APx Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Everest and APx Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for Everest and APx Acquisition

-0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Everest and APx is -0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Everest Group and APx Acquisition I in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on APx Acquisition I and Everest is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Everest Group are associated (or correlated) with APx Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of APx Acquisition I has no effect on the direction of Everest i.e., Everest and APx Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Everest and APx Acquisition

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Everest Group is expected to under-perform the APx Acquisition. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Everest Group is 1.1 times less risky than APx Acquisition. The stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The APx Acquisition I is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,186  in APx Acquisition I on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.00  from holding APx Acquisition I or generate 0.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Everest Group  vs.  APx Acquisition I

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Everest Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Everest Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Everest is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
APx Acquisition I 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in APx Acquisition I are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, APx Acquisition is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Everest and APx Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Everest and APx Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite Everest and APx Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Everest position performs unexpectedly, APx Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in APx Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in APx Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind Everest Group and APx Acquisition I pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA