Correlation Between EJF Investments and Livermore Investments

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both EJF Investments and Livermore Investments at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining EJF Investments and Livermore Investments into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between EJF Investments and Livermore Investments Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on EJF Investments and Livermore Investments and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in EJF Investments with a short position of Livermore Investments. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of EJF Investments and Livermore Investments.

Diversification Opportunities for EJF Investments and Livermore Investments

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between EJF and Livermore is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding EJF Investments and Livermore Investments Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Livermore Investments and EJF Investments is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on EJF Investments are associated (or correlated) with Livermore Investments. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Livermore Investments has no effect on the direction of EJF Investments i.e., EJF Investments and Livermore Investments go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between EJF Investments and Livermore Investments

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon EJF Investments is expected to generate 2.1 times less return on investment than Livermore Investments. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, EJF Investments is 1.3 times less risky than Livermore Investments. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Livermore Investments Group is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,644  in Livermore Investments Group on November 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,206  from holding Livermore Investments Group or generate 60.54% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

EJF Investments  vs.  Livermore Investments Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
EJF Investments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in EJF Investments are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, EJF Investments may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.
Livermore Investments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Livermore Investments Group are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Livermore Investments exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

EJF Investments and Livermore Investments Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with EJF Investments and Livermore Investments

The main advantage of trading using opposite EJF Investments and Livermore Investments positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if EJF Investments position performs unexpectedly, Livermore Investments can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Livermore Investments will offset losses from the drop in Livermore Investments' long position.
The idea behind EJF Investments and Livermore Investments Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm