Correlation Between Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Everest Metals with a short position of Carnegie Clean. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean.

Diversification Opportunities for Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Everest and Carnegie is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Carnegie Clean Energy and Everest Metals is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Everest Metals are associated (or correlated) with Carnegie Clean. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Carnegie Clean Energy has no effect on the direction of Everest Metals i.e., Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Everest Metals is expected to generate 6.34 times less return on investment than Carnegie Clean. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Everest Metals is 3.57 times less risky than Carnegie Clean. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Carnegie Clean Energy is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7.50  in Carnegie Clean Energy on November 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.40) from holding Carnegie Clean Energy or give up 45.33% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Everest Metals  vs.  Carnegie Clean Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Everest Metals 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Everest Metals are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain fundamental indicators, Everest Metals unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Carnegie Clean Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Carnegie Clean Energy are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Carnegie Clean may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.

Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean

The main advantage of trading using opposite Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Everest Metals position performs unexpectedly, Carnegie Clean can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Carnegie Clean will offset losses from the drop in Carnegie Clean's long position.
The idea behind Everest Metals and Carnegie Clean Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance