Correlation Between Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Electromagnetic Geoservices ASA and Questerre Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Electromagnetic Geoservices with a short position of Questerre Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy.
Diversification Opportunities for Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy
-0.4 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Electromagnetic and Questerre is -0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Electromagnetic Geoservices AS and Questerre Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Questerre Energy and Electromagnetic Geoservices is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Electromagnetic Geoservices ASA are associated (or correlated) with Questerre Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Questerre Energy has no effect on the direction of Electromagnetic Geoservices i.e., Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Electromagnetic Geoservices is expected to generate 1.96 times less return on investment than Questerre Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Electromagnetic Geoservices ASA is 1.22 times less risky than Questerre Energy. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Questerre Energy is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 188.00 in Questerre Energy on November 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 8.00 from holding Questerre Energy or generate 4.26% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Very Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Electromagnetic Geoservices AS vs. Questerre Energy
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Electromagnetic Geoservices |
| Questerre Energy |
Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Electromagnetic Geoservices and Questerre Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Electromagnetic Geoservices position performs unexpectedly, Questerre Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Questerre Energy will offset losses from the drop in Questerre Energy's long position.| Electromagnetic Geoservices vs. Solstad Offsho | Electromagnetic Geoservices vs. Eidesvik Offshore ASA | Electromagnetic Geoservices vs. Prosafe SE | Electromagnetic Geoservices vs. BW Offshore |
| Questerre Energy vs. Kongsberg Automotive Holding | Questerre Energy vs. Okea ASA | Questerre Energy vs. Hunter Group ASA |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world |