Correlation Between Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Shelton Emerging Markets and Columbia Seligman Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Shelton Emerging with a short position of Columbia Seligman. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman.

Diversification Opportunities for Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Shelton and Columbia is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Shelton Emerging Markets and Columbia Seligman Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Seligman Global and Shelton Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Shelton Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Seligman. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Seligman Global has no effect on the direction of Shelton Emerging i.e., Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman

Assuming the 90 days horizon Shelton Emerging Markets is expected to under-perform the Columbia Seligman. In addition to that, Shelton Emerging is 1.07 times more volatile than Columbia Seligman Global. It trades about -0.22 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Seligman Global is currently generating about 0.39 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  7,139  in Columbia Seligman Global on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  556.00  from holding Columbia Seligman Global or generate 7.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Shelton Emerging Markets  vs.  Columbia Seligman Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Shelton Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Shelton Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Shelton Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Seligman Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Seligman Global are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Columbia Seligman showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman

The main advantage of trading using opposite Shelton Emerging and Columbia Seligman positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Shelton Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Seligman can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Seligman will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Seligman's long position.
The idea behind Shelton Emerging Markets and Columbia Seligman Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency