Correlation Between Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energizer Holdings with a short position of Colgate Palmolive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive.

Diversification Opportunities for Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

-0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energizer and Colgate is -0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energizer Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Colgate Palmolive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Colgate Palmolive has no effect on the direction of Energizer Holdings i.e., Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Energizer Holdings is expected to generate 1.57 times more return on investment than Colgate Palmolive. However, Energizer Holdings is 1.57 times more volatile than Colgate Palmolive. It trades about 0.4 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Colgate Palmolive is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,277  in Energizer Holdings on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  600.00  from holding Energizer Holdings or generate 18.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energizer Holdings  vs.  Colgate Palmolive

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energizer Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energizer Holdings are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively inconsistent basic indicators, Energizer Holdings reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Colgate Palmolive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Colgate Palmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's essential indicators remain persistent and the latest mess on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-standing gains for the company institutional investors.

Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energizer Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Colgate Palmolive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Colgate Palmolive will offset losses from the drop in Colgate Palmolive's long position.
The idea behind Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities