Correlation Between Empire Global and CLS Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Empire Global and CLS Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Empire Global and CLS Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Empire Global Gaming and CLS Holdings USA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Empire Global and CLS Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Empire Global with a short position of CLS Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Empire Global and CLS Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Empire Global and CLS Holdings

-0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Empire and CLS is -0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Empire Global Gaming and CLS Holdings USA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CLS Holdings USA and Empire Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Empire Global Gaming are associated (or correlated) with CLS Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CLS Holdings USA has no effect on the direction of Empire Global i.e., Empire Global and CLS Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Empire Global and CLS Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Empire Global Gaming is expected to under-perform the CLS Holdings. In addition to that, Empire Global is 1.67 times more volatile than CLS Holdings USA. It trades about -0.22 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. CLS Holdings USA is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  5.00  in CLS Holdings USA on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.71) from holding CLS Holdings USA or give up 14.2% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Empire Global Gaming  vs.  CLS Holdings USA

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Empire Global Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Empire Global Gaming has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
CLS Holdings USA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CLS Holdings USA are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly fragile basic indicators, CLS Holdings demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Empire Global and CLS Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Empire Global and CLS Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Empire Global and CLS Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Empire Global position performs unexpectedly, CLS Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CLS Holdings will offset losses from the drop in CLS Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Empire Global Gaming and CLS Holdings USA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements