Correlation Between Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Epsilon Energy with a short position of Crescent Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Epsilon and Crescent is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Crescent Energy and Epsilon Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Epsilon Energy are associated (or correlated) with Crescent Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Crescent Energy has no effect on the direction of Epsilon Energy i.e., Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Epsilon Energy is expected to generate 32.82 times less return on investment than Crescent Energy. In addition to that, Epsilon Energy is 1.3 times more volatile than Crescent Energy Co. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Crescent Energy Co is currently generating about 0.51 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,210  in Crescent Energy Co on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  275.00  from holding Crescent Energy Co or generate 22.73% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Epsilon Energy  vs.  Crescent Energy Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Epsilon Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Epsilon Energy are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Epsilon Energy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Crescent Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Crescent Energy Co are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal technical and fundamental indicators, Crescent Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Epsilon Energy position performs unexpectedly, Crescent Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crescent Energy will offset losses from the drop in Crescent Energy's long position.
The idea behind Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world