Correlation Between Energy Services and Great Lakes

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Services and Great Lakes at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Services and Great Lakes into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Services and Great Lakes Dredge, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Services and Great Lakes and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Services with a short position of Great Lakes. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Services and Great Lakes.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Services and Great Lakes

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Great is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Services and Great Lakes Dredge in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Great Lakes Dredge and Energy Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Services are associated (or correlated) with Great Lakes. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Great Lakes Dredge has no effect on the direction of Energy Services i.e., Energy Services and Great Lakes go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Services and Great Lakes

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Energy Services is expected to generate 1.48 times more return on investment than Great Lakes. However, Energy Services is 1.48 times more volatile than Great Lakes Dredge. It trades about 0.45 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Great Lakes Dredge is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,159  in Energy Services on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  416.00  from holding Energy Services or generate 35.89% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energy Services  vs.  Great Lakes Dredge

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

22 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Services are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat fragile basic indicators, Energy Services sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Great Lakes Dredge 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Great Lakes Dredge are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Great Lakes exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Energy Services and Great Lakes Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energy Services and Great Lakes

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Services and Great Lakes positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Services position performs unexpectedly, Great Lakes can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Great Lakes will offset losses from the drop in Great Lakes' long position.
The idea behind Energy Services and Great Lakes Dredge pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing