Correlation Between Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Transfer LP and Kinder Morgan, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Transfer with a short position of Kinder Morgan. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan

0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Kinder is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Transfer LP and Kinder Morgan in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kinder Morgan and Energy Transfer is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Transfer LP are associated (or correlated) with Kinder Morgan. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kinder Morgan has no effect on the direction of Energy Transfer i.e., Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Energy Transfer is expected to generate 1.04 times less return on investment than Kinder Morgan. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Energy Transfer LP is 1.06 times less risky than Kinder Morgan. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Kinder Morgan is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,633  in Kinder Morgan on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,216  from holding Kinder Morgan or generate 74.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energy Transfer LP  vs.  Kinder Morgan

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energy Transfer LP 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

26 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Transfer LP are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Energy Transfer unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Kinder Morgan 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

28 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kinder Morgan are ranked lower than 28 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly unsteady primary indicators, Kinder Morgan demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Transfer position performs unexpectedly, Kinder Morgan can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kinder Morgan will offset losses from the drop in Kinder Morgan's long position.
The idea behind Energy Transfer LP and Kinder Morgan pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges