Correlation Between Excite Technology and Harvest Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Excite Technology and Harvest Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Excite Technology and Harvest Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Excite Technology Services and Harvest Technology Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Excite Technology and Harvest Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Excite Technology with a short position of Harvest Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Excite Technology and Harvest Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Excite Technology and Harvest Technology

-0.45
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Excite and Harvest is -0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Excite Technology Services and Harvest Technology Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Harvest Technology and Excite Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Excite Technology Services are associated (or correlated) with Harvest Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Harvest Technology has no effect on the direction of Excite Technology i.e., Excite Technology and Harvest Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Excite Technology and Harvest Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Excite Technology Services is expected to under-perform the Harvest Technology. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Excite Technology Services is 1.54 times less risky than Harvest Technology. The stock trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Harvest Technology Group is currently generating about 0.26 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1.40  in Harvest Technology Group on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.90  from holding Harvest Technology Group or generate 64.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Excite Technology Services  vs.  Harvest Technology Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Excite Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Excite Technology Services are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Excite Technology unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Harvest Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Harvest Technology Group are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Harvest Technology unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Excite Technology and Harvest Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Excite Technology and Harvest Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Excite Technology and Harvest Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Excite Technology position performs unexpectedly, Harvest Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Harvest Technology will offset losses from the drop in Harvest Technology's long position.
The idea behind Excite Technology Services and Harvest Technology Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges