Correlation Between Ford and Columbia Greater

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Columbia Greater at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Columbia Greater into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Columbia Greater China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Columbia Greater and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Columbia Greater. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Columbia Greater.

Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Columbia Greater

-0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ford and Columbia is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Columbia Greater China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Greater China and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Greater. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Greater China has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Columbia Greater go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ford and Columbia Greater

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford Motor is expected to generate 1.39 times more return on investment than Columbia Greater. However, Ford is 1.39 times more volatile than Columbia Greater China. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Greater China is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,108  in Ford Motor on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding Ford Motor or generate 2.89% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ford Motor  vs.  Columbia Greater China

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ford Motor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ford Motor are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Ford is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Columbia Greater China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Greater China are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Columbia Greater may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Ford and Columbia Greater Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ford and Columbia Greater

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Columbia Greater positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Greater can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Greater will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Greater's long position.
The idea behind Ford Motor and Columbia Greater China pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets