Correlation Between Ford and Goldman Sachs
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Goldman Sachs Mlp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Goldman Sachs.
Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Goldman Sachs
0.51 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Ford and Goldman is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Goldman Sachs Mlp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Mlp and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Mlp has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ford and Goldman Sachs
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford is expected to generate 9.26 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Ford is 1.22 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Mlp. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Mlp is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 1,257 in Goldman Sachs Mlp on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 326.00 from holding Goldman Sachs Mlp or generate 25.93% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 28.48% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Ford Motor vs. Goldman Sachs Mlp
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Ford Motor |
| Goldman Sachs Mlp |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Ford and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Ford and Goldman Sachs
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.The idea behind Ford Motor and Goldman Sachs Mlp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| Goldman Sachs vs. Blackrock Floating Rate | Goldman Sachs vs. Pioneer Floating Rate | Goldman Sachs vs. Eaton Vance Senior | Goldman Sachs vs. Eaton Vance Senior |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Other Complementary Tools
| Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years |