Correlation Between Ford and Guggenheim Managed
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Guggenheim Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Guggenheim Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Guggenheim Managed Futures, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Guggenheim Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Guggenheim Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Guggenheim Managed.
Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Guggenheim Managed
-0.79 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Ford and Guggenheim is -0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Guggenheim Managed Futures in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guggenheim Managed and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Guggenheim Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guggenheim Managed has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Guggenheim Managed go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ford and Guggenheim Managed
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford Motor is expected to generate 2.16 times more return on investment than Guggenheim Managed. However, Ford is 2.16 times more volatile than Guggenheim Managed Futures. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guggenheim Managed Futures is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest 974.00 in Ford Motor on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 44.00 from holding Ford Motor or generate 4.52% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 95.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Ford Motor vs. Guggenheim Managed Futures
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Ford Motor |
| Guggenheim Managed |
Ford and Guggenheim Managed Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Ford and Guggenheim Managed
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Guggenheim Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Guggenheim Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guggenheim Managed will offset losses from the drop in Guggenheim Managed's long position.The idea behind Ford Motor and Guggenheim Managed Futures pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| Guggenheim Managed vs. Lifestyle Ii Moderate | Guggenheim Managed vs. Tiaa Cref Lifestyle Moderate | Guggenheim Managed vs. Moderate Balanced Allocation | Guggenheim Managed vs. Jp Morgan Smartretirement |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities |