Correlation Between Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fair Oaks Income and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fair Oaks with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

-0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fair and Litigation is -0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fair Oaks Income and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Fair Oaks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fair Oaks Income are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Fair Oaks i.e., Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fair Oaks is expected to generate 1.06 times less return on investment than Litigation Capital. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Fair Oaks Income is 3.98 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,498  in Litigation Capital Management on November 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,752  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 26.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fair Oaks Income  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fair Oaks Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fair Oaks Income are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Fair Oaks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fair Oaks position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Fair Oaks Income and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets