Correlation Between Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fair Oaks Income and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fair Oaks with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fair and Litigation is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fair Oaks Income and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Fair Oaks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fair Oaks Income are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Fair Oaks i.e., Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fair Oaks is expected to generate 2.71 times less return on investment than Litigation Capital. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Fair Oaks Income is 4.0 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,788  in Litigation Capital Management on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,912  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 72.36% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.74%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fair Oaks Income  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fair Oaks Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fair Oaks Income are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Fair Oaks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fair Oaks and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fair Oaks position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Fair Oaks Income and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities