Correlation Between Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Advisor Balanced and Fidelity Growth Discovery, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Advisor with a short position of Fidelity Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Fidelity is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Advisor Balanced and Fidelity Growth Discovery in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Growth Discovery and Fidelity Advisor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Advisor Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Growth Discovery has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Advisor i.e., Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Advisor is expected to generate 1.57 times less return on investment than Fidelity Growth. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Fidelity Advisor Balanced is 1.93 times less risky than Fidelity Growth. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Growth Discovery is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,094  in Fidelity Growth Discovery on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,518  from holding Fidelity Growth Discovery or generate 61.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity Advisor Balanced  vs.  Fidelity Growth Discovery

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity Advisor Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Advisor Balanced are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Fidelity Advisor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Growth Discovery 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Growth Discovery are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking signals, Fidelity Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Advisor and Fidelity Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Advisor position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Growth will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Growth's long position.
The idea behind Fidelity Advisor Balanced and Fidelity Growth Discovery pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation