Correlation Between Fertilizers and Sterling

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fertilizers and Sterling at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fertilizers and Sterling into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fertilizers and Chemicals and Sterling and Wilson, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fertilizers and Sterling and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fertilizers with a short position of Sterling. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fertilizers and Sterling.

Diversification Opportunities for Fertilizers and Sterling

-0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fertilizers and Sterling is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fertilizers and Chemicals and Sterling and Wilson in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sterling and Wilson and Fertilizers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fertilizers and Chemicals are associated (or correlated) with Sterling. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sterling and Wilson has no effect on the direction of Fertilizers i.e., Fertilizers and Sterling go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fertilizers and Sterling

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fertilizers and Chemicals is expected to generate 1.31 times more return on investment than Sterling. However, Fertilizers is 1.31 times more volatile than Sterling and Wilson. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sterling and Wilson is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  25,307  in Fertilizers and Chemicals on November 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  66,788  from holding Fertilizers and Chemicals or generate 263.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fertilizers and Chemicals  vs.  Sterling and Wilson

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fertilizers and Chemicals 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fertilizers and Chemicals are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Fertilizers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Sterling and Wilson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sterling and Wilson has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Fertilizers and Sterling Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fertilizers and Sterling

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fertilizers and Sterling positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fertilizers position performs unexpectedly, Sterling can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sterling will offset losses from the drop in Sterling's long position.
The idea behind Fertilizers and Chemicals and Sterling and Wilson pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world