Correlation Between Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Frequency Electronics with a short position of Electronic Systems. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems.

Diversification Opportunities for Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems

-0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Frequency and Electronic is -0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Electronic Systems and Frequency Electronics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Frequency Electronics are associated (or correlated) with Electronic Systems. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Electronic Systems has no effect on the direction of Frequency Electronics i.e., Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Frequency Electronics is expected to generate 0.35 times more return on investment than Electronic Systems. However, Frequency Electronics is 2.88 times less risky than Electronic Systems. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Electronic Systems Technology is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,850  in Frequency Electronics on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (177.00) from holding Frequency Electronics or give up 9.57% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Frequency Electronics  vs.  Electronic Systems Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Frequency Electronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Frequency Electronics are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very inconsistent forward indicators, Frequency Electronics displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Electronic Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Electronic Systems Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems

The main advantage of trading using opposite Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Frequency Electronics position performs unexpectedly, Electronic Systems can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Electronic Systems will offset losses from the drop in Electronic Systems' long position.
The idea behind Frequency Electronics and Electronic Systems Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance