Correlation Between Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Vertible Securities and Advent Claymore Convertible, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Convertible with a short position of Advent Claymore. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Advent is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Vertible Securities and Advent Claymore Convertible in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Advent Claymore Conv and Franklin Convertible is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Vertible Securities are associated (or correlated) with Advent Claymore. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Advent Claymore Conv has no effect on the direction of Franklin Convertible i.e., Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore

Assuming the 90 days horizon Franklin Convertible is expected to generate 1.24 times less return on investment than Advent Claymore. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Franklin Vertible Securities is 1.02 times less risky than Advent Claymore. It trades about 0.48 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Advent Claymore Convertible is currently generating about 0.58 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,111  in Advent Claymore Convertible on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  89.00  from holding Advent Claymore Convertible or generate 8.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin Vertible Securities  vs.  Advent Claymore Convertible

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin Convertible 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

27 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Vertible Securities are ranked lower than 27 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Franklin Convertible may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Advent Claymore Conv 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Advent Claymore Convertible are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent basic indicators, Advent Claymore is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Convertible and Advent Claymore positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Convertible position performs unexpectedly, Advent Claymore can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Advent Claymore will offset losses from the drop in Advent Claymore's long position.
The idea behind Franklin Vertible Securities and Advent Claymore Convertible pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk