Correlation Between Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Balanced Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs E, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Balanced Fund with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Balanced and Goldman is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Balanced Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs E in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs E and Balanced Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Balanced Fund Retail are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs E has no effect on the direction of Balanced Fund i.e., Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Balanced Fund Retail is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Balanced Fund is 1.77 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs E. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs E is currently generating about 0.27 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  907.00  in Goldman Sachs E on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15.00  from holding Goldman Sachs E or generate 1.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Balanced Fund Retail  vs.  Goldman Sachs E

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Balanced Fund Retail 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Balanced Fund Retail has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.
Goldman Sachs E 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs E are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Balanced Fund and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Balanced Fund position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Balanced Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs E pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years