Correlation Between Fs Managed and Boston Common

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fs Managed and Boston Common at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fs Managed and Boston Common into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fs Managed Futures and Boston Mon Equity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fs Managed and Boston Common and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fs Managed with a short position of Boston Common. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fs Managed and Boston Common.

Diversification Opportunities for Fs Managed and Boston Common

-0.48
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FMFFX and Boston is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fs Managed Futures and Boston Mon Equity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Boston Mon Equity and Fs Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fs Managed Futures are associated (or correlated) with Boston Common. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Boston Mon Equity has no effect on the direction of Fs Managed i.e., Fs Managed and Boston Common go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fs Managed and Boston Common

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fs Managed Futures is expected to under-perform the Boston Common. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Fs Managed Futures is 1.26 times less risky than Boston Common. The mutual fund trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Boston Mon Equity is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,329  in Boston Mon Equity on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,169  from holding Boston Mon Equity or generate 40.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy91.35%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fs Managed Futures  vs.  Boston Mon Equity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fs Managed Futures 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Over the last 90 days Fs Managed Futures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Fs Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Boston Mon Equity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Boston Mon Equity are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak primary indicators, Boston Common may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Fs Managed and Boston Common Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fs Managed and Boston Common

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fs Managed and Boston Common positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fs Managed position performs unexpectedly, Boston Common can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Boston Common will offset losses from the drop in Boston Common's long position.
The idea behind Fs Managed Futures and Boston Mon Equity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Other Complementary Tools

Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance