Correlation Between Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Natural Resources and Banking Portfolio Banking, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Natural with a short position of Banking Portfolio. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio

0.29
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and BANKING is 0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Natural Resources and Banking Portfolio Banking in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Banking Portfolio Banking and Fidelity Natural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Natural Resources are associated (or correlated) with Banking Portfolio. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Banking Portfolio Banking has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Natural i.e., Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Natural Resources is expected to under-perform the Banking Portfolio. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Fidelity Natural Resources is 2.17 times less risky than Banking Portfolio. The mutual fund trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Banking Portfolio Banking is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,995  in Banking Portfolio Banking on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  286.00  from holding Banking Portfolio Banking or generate 9.55% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity Natural Resources  vs.  Banking Portfolio Banking

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity Natural Res 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Fidelity Natural Resources has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity Natural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Banking Portfolio Banking 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Banking Portfolio Banking are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental drivers, Banking Portfolio may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Natural and Banking Portfolio positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Natural position performs unexpectedly, Banking Portfolio can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Banking Portfolio will offset losses from the drop in Banking Portfolio's long position.
The idea behind Fidelity Natural Resources and Banking Portfolio Banking pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities