Correlation Between MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MicroSectors FANG ETN and iShares Cohen Steers, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MicroSectors FANG with a short position of IShares Cohen. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen.

Diversification Opportunities for MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen

-0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between MicroSectors and IShares is -0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MicroSectors FANG ETN and iShares Cohen Steers in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on iShares Cohen Steers and MicroSectors FANG is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MicroSectors FANG ETN are associated (or correlated) with IShares Cohen. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of iShares Cohen Steers has no effect on the direction of MicroSectors FANG i.e., MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen

Given the investment horizon of 90 days MicroSectors FANG ETN is expected to generate 1.34 times more return on investment than IShares Cohen. However, MicroSectors FANG is 1.34 times more volatile than iShares Cohen Steers. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. iShares Cohen Steers is currently generating about 0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,780  in MicroSectors FANG ETN on November 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  239.00  from holding MicroSectors FANG ETN or generate 4.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

MicroSectors FANG ETN  vs.  iShares Cohen Steers

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MicroSectors FANG ETN 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MicroSectors FANG ETN are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, MicroSectors FANG unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
iShares Cohen Steers 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days iShares Cohen Steers has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, IShares Cohen is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen

The main advantage of trading using opposite MicroSectors FANG and IShares Cohen positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MicroSectors FANG position performs unexpectedly, IShares Cohen can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IShares Cohen will offset losses from the drop in IShares Cohen's long position.
The idea behind MicroSectors FANG ETN and iShares Cohen Steers pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities