Correlation Between Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financials Ultrasector Profund and Jpmorgan Preferred And, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financials Ultrasector with a short position of Jpmorgan Preferred. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred.

Diversification Opportunities for Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred

0.42
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Financials and Jpmorgan is 0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financials Ultrasector Profund and Jpmorgan Preferred And in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jpmorgan Preferred And and Financials Ultrasector is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financials Ultrasector Profund are associated (or correlated) with Jpmorgan Preferred. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jpmorgan Preferred And has no effect on the direction of Financials Ultrasector i.e., Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred

Assuming the 90 days horizon Financials Ultrasector Profund is expected to generate 16.76 times more return on investment than Jpmorgan Preferred. However, Financials Ultrasector is 16.76 times more volatile than Jpmorgan Preferred And. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jpmorgan Preferred And is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,107  in Financials Ultrasector Profund on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  491.00  from holding Financials Ultrasector Profund or generate 11.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Financials Ultrasector Profund  vs.  Jpmorgan Preferred And

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Financials Ultrasector 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financials Ultrasector Profund are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financials Ultrasector showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Jpmorgan Preferred And 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Jpmorgan Preferred And are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Jpmorgan Preferred is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred

The main advantage of trading using opposite Financials Ultrasector and Jpmorgan Preferred positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financials Ultrasector position performs unexpectedly, Jpmorgan Preferred can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jpmorgan Preferred will offset losses from the drop in Jpmorgan Preferred's long position.
The idea behind Financials Ultrasector Profund and Jpmorgan Preferred And pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals