Correlation Between Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Infrastructure with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers

0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Cohen is 0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Global and Fidelity Infrastructure is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Infrastructure are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Global has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Infrastructure i.e., Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Infrastructure is expected to generate 1.02 times more return on investment than Cohen Steers. However, Fidelity Infrastructure is 1.02 times more volatile than Cohen Steers Global. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Global is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,137  in Fidelity Infrastructure on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  320.00  from holding Fidelity Infrastructure or generate 28.14% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity Infrastructure  vs.  Cohen Steers Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Infrastructure are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Fidelity Infrastructure may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Cohen Steers Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Global are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Infrastructure position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind Fidelity Infrastructure and Cohen Steers Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing