Correlation Between Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin New York and Oppenheimer Rochester, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin New with a short position of Oppenheimer Rochester. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester

0.99
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Oppenheimer is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin New York and Oppenheimer Rochester in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin New York are associated (or correlated) with Oppenheimer Rochester. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oppenheimer Rochester has no effect on the direction of Franklin New i.e., Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester

Assuming the 90 days horizon Franklin New is expected to generate 1.11 times less return on investment than Oppenheimer Rochester. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Franklin New York is 1.39 times less risky than Oppenheimer Rochester. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oppenheimer Rochester is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,515  in Oppenheimer Rochester on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  27.00  from holding Oppenheimer Rochester or generate 1.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin New York  vs.  Oppenheimer Rochester

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin New York 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin New York are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Franklin New is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Oppenheimer Rochester 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Oppenheimer Rochester are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Oppenheimer Rochester is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin New and Oppenheimer Rochester positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin New position performs unexpectedly, Oppenheimer Rochester can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oppenheimer Rochester will offset losses from the drop in Oppenheimer Rochester's long position.
The idea behind Franklin New York and Oppenheimer Rochester pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk