Correlation Between Foods Inns and Computer Age

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Foods Inns and Computer Age at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Foods Inns and Computer Age into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Foods Inns Limited and Computer Age Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Foods Inns and Computer Age and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Foods Inns with a short position of Computer Age. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Foods Inns and Computer Age.

Diversification Opportunities for Foods Inns and Computer Age

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Foods and Computer is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Foods Inns Limited and Computer Age Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Computer Age Management and Foods Inns is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Foods Inns Limited are associated (or correlated) with Computer Age. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Computer Age Management has no effect on the direction of Foods Inns i.e., Foods Inns and Computer Age go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Foods Inns and Computer Age

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Foods Inns Limited is expected to generate 1.46 times more return on investment than Computer Age. However, Foods Inns is 1.46 times more volatile than Computer Age Management. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Computer Age Management is currently generating about -0.45 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,633  in Foods Inns Limited on November 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (559.00) from holding Foods Inns Limited or give up 4.81% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Foods Inns Limited  vs.  Computer Age Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Foods Inns Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Foods Inns Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest inconsistent performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.
Computer Age Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Computer Age Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Foods Inns and Computer Age Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Foods Inns and Computer Age

The main advantage of trading using opposite Foods Inns and Computer Age positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Foods Inns position performs unexpectedly, Computer Age can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Computer Age will offset losses from the drop in Computer Age's long position.
The idea behind Foods Inns Limited and Computer Age Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios