Correlation Between Four Leaf and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Four Leaf and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Four Leaf and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Four Leaf Acquisition and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Four Leaf and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Four Leaf with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Four Leaf and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Four Leaf and Procter Gamble

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Four and Procter is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Four Leaf Acquisition and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Four Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Four Leaf Acquisition are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Four Leaf i.e., Four Leaf and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Four Leaf and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days horizon Four Leaf is expected to generate 2.03 times less return on investment than Procter Gamble. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Four Leaf Acquisition is 2.43 times less risky than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  14,487  in Procter Gamble on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,439  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 23.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy87.27%
ValuesDaily Returns

Four Leaf Acquisition  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Four Leaf Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Four Leaf Acquisition has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable essential indicators, Four Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Four Leaf and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Four Leaf and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Four Leaf and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Four Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Four Leaf Acquisition and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences