Correlation Between Fisher Paykel and Future Generation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fisher Paykel and Future Generation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fisher Paykel and Future Generation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Future Generation Australia, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fisher Paykel and Future Generation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fisher Paykel with a short position of Future Generation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fisher Paykel and Future Generation.

Diversification Opportunities for Fisher Paykel and Future Generation

0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fisher and Future is 0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Future Generation Australia in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Future Generation and Fisher Paykel is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fisher Paykel Healthcare are associated (or correlated) with Future Generation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Future Generation has no effect on the direction of Fisher Paykel i.e., Fisher Paykel and Future Generation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fisher Paykel and Future Generation

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fisher Paykel Healthcare is expected to generate 1.59 times more return on investment than Future Generation. However, Fisher Paykel is 1.59 times more volatile than Future Generation Australia. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Future Generation Australia is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,191  in Fisher Paykel Healthcare on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,282  from holding Fisher Paykel Healthcare or generate 58.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fisher Paykel Healthcare  vs.  Future Generation Australia

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fisher Paykel Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fisher Paykel Healthcare are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Fisher Paykel is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Future Generation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Future Generation Australia are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Future Generation may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Fisher Paykel and Future Generation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fisher Paykel and Future Generation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fisher Paykel and Future Generation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fisher Paykel position performs unexpectedly, Future Generation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Future Generation will offset losses from the drop in Future Generation's long position.
The idea behind Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Future Generation Australia pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments