Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Financial and Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Catalyst/millburn. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn

0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Catalyst/millburn is 0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Financial and Catalystmillburn Hedge Strateg in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Catalystmillburn Hedge and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Financial are associated (or correlated) with Catalyst/millburn. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Catalystmillburn Hedge has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Financial is expected to generate 30.03 times more return on investment than Catalyst/millburn. However, Goldman Sachs is 30.03 times more volatile than Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  402.00  in Goldman Sachs Financial on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (302.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Financial or give up 75.12% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.14%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Financial  vs.  Catalystmillburn Hedge Strateg

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Financial has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Catalystmillburn Hedge 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Catalyst/millburn may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Catalyst/millburn positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Catalyst/millburn can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Catalyst/millburn will offset losses from the drop in Catalyst/millburn's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Financial and Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets