Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Natural Alternatives International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Natural Alternatives. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Natural is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Natural Alternatives Internati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Natural Alternatives and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Natural Alternatives. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Natural Alternatives has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to generate 0.94 times more return on investment than Natural Alternatives. However, FitLife Brands, Common is 1.07 times less risky than Natural Alternatives. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Natural Alternatives International is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,910  in FitLife Brands, Common on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,320  from holding FitLife Brands, Common or generate 69.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Natural Alternatives Internati

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Natural Alternatives 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Natural Alternatives International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.

FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Natural Alternatives can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Natural Alternatives will offset losses from the drop in Natural Alternatives' long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Natural Alternatives International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk