Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Oak Woods Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Oak Woods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods

-0.46
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Oak is -0.46. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Oak Woods Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oak Woods Acquisition and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Oak Woods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oak Woods Acquisition has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to generate 16.49 times more return on investment than Oak Woods. However, FitLife Brands, is 16.49 times more volatile than Oak Woods Acquisition. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oak Woods Acquisition is currently generating about 0.46 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,125  in FitLife Brands, Common on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  287.00  from holding FitLife Brands, Common or generate 9.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Oak Woods Acquisition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FitLife Brands, Common are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Oak Woods Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

25 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Oak Woods Acquisition are ranked lower than 25 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable forward-looking signals, Oak Woods is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Oak Woods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Oak Woods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oak Woods will offset losses from the drop in Oak Woods' long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Oak Woods Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance