Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Seaport Entertainment Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Seaport Entertainment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment

0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Seaport is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Seaport Entertainment Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Seaport Entertainment and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Seaport Entertainment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Seaport Entertainment has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to generate 0.65 times more return on investment than Seaport Entertainment. However, FitLife Brands, Common is 1.54 times less risky than Seaport Entertainment. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Seaport Entertainment Group is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,793  in FitLife Brands, Common on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  505.00  from holding FitLife Brands, Common or generate 18.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy72.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Seaport Entertainment Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Seaport Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Seaport Entertainment Group are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Seaport Entertainment reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Seaport Entertainment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Seaport Entertainment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Seaport Entertainment will offset losses from the drop in Seaport Entertainment's long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Seaport Entertainment Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum