Correlation Between Mount Gibson and Penn National

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mount Gibson and Penn National at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mount Gibson and Penn National into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mount Gibson Iron and Penn National Gaming, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mount Gibson and Penn National and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mount Gibson with a short position of Penn National. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mount Gibson and Penn National.

Diversification Opportunities for Mount Gibson and Penn National

-0.42
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mount and Penn is -0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mount Gibson Iron and Penn National Gaming in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Penn National Gaming and Mount Gibson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mount Gibson Iron are associated (or correlated) with Penn National. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Penn National Gaming has no effect on the direction of Mount Gibson i.e., Mount Gibson and Penn National go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mount Gibson and Penn National

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mount Gibson Iron is expected to under-perform the Penn National. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Mount Gibson Iron is 1.46 times less risky than Penn National. The stock trades about -0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Penn National Gaming is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,871  in Penn National Gaming on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (60.00) from holding Penn National Gaming or give up 3.21% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mount Gibson Iron  vs.  Penn National Gaming

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mount Gibson Iron 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mount Gibson Iron has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Penn National may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Mount Gibson and Penn National Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mount Gibson and Penn National

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mount Gibson and Penn National positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mount Gibson position performs unexpectedly, Penn National can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Penn National will offset losses from the drop in Penn National's long position.
The idea behind Mount Gibson Iron and Penn National Gaming pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance