Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Absolute and Litman Gregory Masters, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Litman Gregory. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Litman is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Absolute and Litman Gregory Masters in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litman Gregory Masters and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Absolute are associated (or correlated) with Litman Gregory. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litman Gregory Masters has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Absolute is expected to generate 1.81 times more return on investment than Litman Gregory. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.81 times more volatile than Litman Gregory Masters. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litman Gregory Masters is currently generating about 0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  955.00  in Goldman Sachs Absolute on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  22.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Absolute or generate 2.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Absolute  vs.  Litman Gregory Masters

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Absolute 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Absolute are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Litman Gregory Masters 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litman Gregory Masters are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Litman Gregory is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Litman Gregory positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Litman Gregory can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litman Gregory will offset losses from the drop in Litman Gregory's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Absolute and Litman Gregory Masters pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments