Correlation Between IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between iShares ESG Balanced and Mackenzie Conservative Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in IShares ESG with a short position of Mackenzie Conservative. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative.

Diversification Opportunities for IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between IShares and Mackenzie is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding iShares ESG Balanced and Mackenzie Conservative Allocat in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Conservative and IShares ESG is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on iShares ESG Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Conservative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Conservative has no effect on the direction of IShares ESG i.e., IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon iShares ESG Balanced is expected to under-perform the Mackenzie Conservative. In addition to that, IShares ESG is 1.53 times more volatile than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,258  in Mackenzie Conservative Allocation on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (28.00) from holding Mackenzie Conservative Allocation or give up 1.24% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy94.74%
ValuesDaily Returns

iShares ESG Balanced  vs.  Mackenzie Conservative Allocat

 Performance 
       Timeline  
iShares ESG Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares ESG Balanced are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, IShares ESG is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mackenzie Conservative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Conservative Allocation are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Mackenzie Conservative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative

The main advantage of trading using opposite IShares ESG and Mackenzie Conservative positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if IShares ESG position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Conservative can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Conservative will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Conservative's long position.
The idea behind iShares ESG Balanced and Mackenzie Conservative Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments