Correlation Between Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Glacier Bancorp with a short position of Sierra Bancorp. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp.

Diversification Opportunities for Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp

0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Glacier and Sierra is 0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra Bancorp and Glacier Bancorp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Glacier Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Bancorp. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra Bancorp has no effect on the direction of Glacier Bancorp i.e., Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Glacier Bancorp is expected to generate 1.14 times less return on investment than Sierra Bancorp. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Glacier Bancorp is 1.01 times less risky than Sierra Bancorp. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sierra Bancorp is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,618  in Sierra Bancorp on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,529  from holding Sierra Bancorp or generate 94.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Glacier Bancorp  vs.  Sierra Bancorp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly fragile fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Sierra Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sierra Bancorp are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively fragile basic indicators, Sierra Bancorp may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp

The main advantage of trading using opposite Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Glacier Bancorp position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Bancorp can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Bancorp will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Bancorp's long position.
The idea behind Glacier Bancorp and Sierra Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world