Correlation Between Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Glacier Bancorp with a short position of Uber Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Glacier and Uber is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Glacier Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with Uber Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Uber Technologies has no effect on the direction of Glacier Bancorp i.e., Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Glacier Bancorp is expected to under-perform the Uber Technologies. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Glacier Bancorp is 1.68 times less risky than Uber Technologies. The stock trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Uber Technologies is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,597  in Uber Technologies on December 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  709.00  from holding Uber Technologies or generate 10.75% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Glacier Bancorp  vs.  Uber Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Glacier Bancorp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.
Uber Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Uber Technologies are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Uber Technologies reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Glacier Bancorp position performs unexpectedly, Uber Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Uber Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Uber Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies