Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Access and Fidelity Sustainable Low, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Fidelity Sustainable. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Fidelity is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Access and Fidelity Sustainable Low in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Sustainable Low and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Access are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Sustainable. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Sustainable Low has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 1.03 times less return on investment than Fidelity Sustainable. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Access is 6.79 times less risky than Fidelity Sustainable. It trades about 0.97 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Sustainable Low is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,007  in Fidelity Sustainable Low on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  16.00  from holding Fidelity Sustainable Low or generate 0.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Access  vs.  Fidelity Sustainable Low

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Access 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

84 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Market Crasher
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Access are ranked lower than 84 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent forward indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.
Fidelity Sustainable Low 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Sustainable Low are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Fidelity Sustainable is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Sustainable positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Sustainable can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Sustainable will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Sustainable's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Access and Fidelity Sustainable Low pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets