Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Short and Boston Partners Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Boston Partners. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners

0.45
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Boston is 0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Short and Boston Partners Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Boston Partners Emerging and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Short are associated (or correlated) with Boston Partners. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Boston Partners Emerging has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Short is expected to generate 0.12 times more return on investment than Boston Partners. However, Goldman Sachs Short is 8.39 times less risky than Boston Partners. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Boston Partners Emerging is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  941.00  in Goldman Sachs Short on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  31.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Short or generate 3.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy41.13%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Short  vs.  Boston Partners Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Short are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Boston Partners Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Boston Partners Emerging has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Boston Partners is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Boston Partners positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Boston Partners can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Boston Partners will offset losses from the drop in Boston Partners' long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Short and Boston Partners Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements