Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Short and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and MFS is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Short and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Short are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 1.91 times less return on investment than Mfs Emerging. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Short is 2.36 times less risky than Mfs Emerging. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,029  in Mfs Emerging Markets on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  183.00  from holding Mfs Emerging Markets or generate 17.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Short  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Short are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Short and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets