Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Energy Services

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Energy Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Energy Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Short and Energy Services Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Energy Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Energy Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Energy Services.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Energy Services

-0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Energy is -0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Short and Energy Services Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Services and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Short are associated (or correlated) with Energy Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Services has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Energy Services go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Energy Services

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 1240.0 times less return on investment than Energy Services. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Short is 17.12 times less risky than Energy Services. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Energy Services Fund is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  17,984  in Energy Services Fund on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,268  from holding Energy Services Fund or generate 7.05% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Short  vs.  Energy Services Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Short has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Services Fund are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Energy Services may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Goldman Sachs and Energy Services Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Energy Services

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Energy Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Energy Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Services will offset losses from the drop in Energy Services' long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Short and Energy Services Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.