Correlation Between Grid Dynamics and Computer Task

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Grid Dynamics and Computer Task at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Grid Dynamics and Computer Task into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Grid Dynamics Holdings and Computer Task Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Grid Dynamics and Computer Task and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Grid Dynamics with a short position of Computer Task. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Grid Dynamics and Computer Task.

Diversification Opportunities for Grid Dynamics and Computer Task

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Grid and Computer is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Grid Dynamics Holdings and Computer Task Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Computer Task Group and Grid Dynamics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Grid Dynamics Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Computer Task. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Computer Task Group has no effect on the direction of Grid Dynamics i.e., Grid Dynamics and Computer Task go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Grid Dynamics and Computer Task

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Grid Dynamics Holdings is expected to generate 1.36 times more return on investment than Computer Task. However, Grid Dynamics is 1.36 times more volatile than Computer Task Group. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Computer Task Group is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,184  in Grid Dynamics Holdings on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  587.00  from holding Grid Dynamics Holdings or generate 49.58% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy31.85%
ValuesDaily Returns

Grid Dynamics Holdings  vs.  Computer Task Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Grid Dynamics Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Grid Dynamics Holdings are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Grid Dynamics displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Computer Task Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Computer Task Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Computer Task is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Grid Dynamics and Computer Task Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Grid Dynamics and Computer Task

The main advantage of trading using opposite Grid Dynamics and Computer Task positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Grid Dynamics position performs unexpectedly, Computer Task can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Computer Task will offset losses from the drop in Computer Task's long position.
The idea behind Grid Dynamics Holdings and Computer Task Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets