Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Inflation and Sierra Strategic Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Sierra Strategic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic

0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Sierra is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Inflation and Sierra Strategic Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra Strategic Income and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Inflation are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Strategic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra Strategic Income has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Inflation is expected to under-perform the Sierra Strategic. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 1.62 times more volatile than Sierra Strategic Income. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Sierra Strategic Income is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,044  in Sierra Strategic Income on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (14.00) from holding Sierra Strategic Income or give up 0.68% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Inflation  vs.  Sierra Strategic Income

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Sierra Strategic Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sierra Strategic Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Sierra Strategic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Sierra Strategic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Strategic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Strategic will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Strategic's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Inflation and Sierra Strategic Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities