Correlation Between Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Growth Allocation Fund and Sierra Strategic Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Growth Allocation with a short position of Sierra Strategic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic.

Diversification Opportunities for Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic

0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Growth and Sierra is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Growth Allocation Fund and Sierra Strategic Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra Strategic Income and Growth Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Growth Allocation Fund are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Strategic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra Strategic Income has no effect on the direction of Growth Allocation i.e., Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic

Assuming the 90 days horizon Growth Allocation Fund is expected to generate 3.92 times more return on investment than Sierra Strategic. However, Growth Allocation is 3.92 times more volatile than Sierra Strategic Income. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sierra Strategic Income is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,271  in Growth Allocation Fund on November 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  41.00  from holding Growth Allocation Fund or generate 3.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Growth Allocation Fund  vs.  Sierra Strategic Income

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Growth Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Growth Allocation Fund are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Growth Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Sierra Strategic Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sierra Strategic Income are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Sierra Strategic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Growth Allocation and Sierra Strategic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Growth Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Strategic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Strategic will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Strategic's long position.
The idea behind Growth Allocation Fund and Sierra Strategic Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope