Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs High and Redwood Managed Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Redwood Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Redwood is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs High and Redwood Managed Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Redwood Managed Municipal and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs High are associated (or correlated) with Redwood Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Redwood Managed Municipal has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs High is expected to generate 1.32 times more return on investment than Redwood Managed. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.32 times more volatile than Redwood Managed Municipal. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Redwood Managed Municipal is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  847.00  in Goldman Sachs High on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  95.00  from holding Goldman Sachs High or generate 11.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs High  vs.  Redwood Managed Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs High 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs High are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Redwood Managed Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Redwood Managed Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Redwood Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Redwood Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Redwood Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Redwood Managed will offset losses from the drop in Redwood Managed's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs High and Redwood Managed Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance