Correlation Between General Mills and Rocky Mountain

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both General Mills and Rocky Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining General Mills and Rocky Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Mills and Rocky Mountain Chocolate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on General Mills and Rocky Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in General Mills with a short position of Rocky Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of General Mills and Rocky Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for General Mills and Rocky Mountain

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between General and Rocky is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Mills and Rocky Mountain Chocolate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rocky Mountain Chocolate and General Mills is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Mills are associated (or correlated) with Rocky Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rocky Mountain Chocolate has no effect on the direction of General Mills i.e., General Mills and Rocky Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between General Mills and Rocky Mountain

Considering the 90-day investment horizon General Mills is expected to generate 0.38 times more return on investment than Rocky Mountain. However, General Mills is 2.6 times less risky than Rocky Mountain. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Rocky Mountain Chocolate is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,998  in General Mills on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,498) from holding General Mills or give up 18.73% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Mills  vs.  Rocky Mountain Chocolate

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Mills 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days General Mills has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's forward indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Rocky Mountain Chocolate are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak fundamental indicators, Rocky Mountain reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

General Mills and Rocky Mountain Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with General Mills and Rocky Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite General Mills and Rocky Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if General Mills position performs unexpectedly, Rocky Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rocky Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Rocky Mountain's long position.
The idea behind General Mills and Rocky Mountain Chocolate pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio