Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Technology and Materials Portfolio Fidelity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Materials Portfolio. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio

-0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Materials is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Technology and Materials Portfolio Fidelity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Materials Portfolio and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Technology are associated (or correlated) with Materials Portfolio. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Materials Portfolio has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Technology is expected to generate 0.99 times more return on investment than Materials Portfolio. However, Goldman Sachs Technology is 1.01 times less risky than Materials Portfolio. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Materials Portfolio Fidelity is currently generating about -0.5 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,615  in Goldman Sachs Technology on October 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (54.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Technology or give up 1.49% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Technology  vs.  Materials Portfolio Fidelity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Technology are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Materials Portfolio 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Materials Portfolio Fidelity has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Materials Portfolio positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Materials Portfolio can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Materials Portfolio will offset losses from the drop in Materials Portfolio's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Technology and Materials Portfolio Fidelity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets