Correlation Between Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gaming Leisure Properties and Iron Mountain Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gaming Leisure with a short position of Iron Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain

0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gaming and Iron is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gaming Leisure Properties and Iron Mountain Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Iron Mountain and Gaming Leisure is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gaming Leisure Properties are associated (or correlated) with Iron Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Iron Mountain has no effect on the direction of Gaming Leisure i.e., Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Gaming Leisure is expected to generate 8.28 times less return on investment than Iron Mountain. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Gaming Leisure Properties is 1.37 times less risky than Iron Mountain. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Iron Mountain Incorporated is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,104  in Iron Mountain Incorporated on August 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  6,526  from holding Iron Mountain Incorporated or generate 127.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Gaming Leisure Properties  vs.  Iron Mountain Incorporated

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Gaming Leisure Properties 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gaming Leisure Properties are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, Gaming Leisure is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.
Iron Mountain 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Iron Mountain Incorporated are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Iron Mountain is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gaming Leisure and Iron Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gaming Leisure position performs unexpectedly, Iron Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Iron Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Iron Mountain's long position.
The idea behind Gaming Leisure Properties and Iron Mountain Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world